Time passes; you get older and
become an adult. You have gone to college or not, you have a job, you make
money, perhaps you are very successful, you get married and have children. You
still have parents. They are, if this is the case, the toxic parents you grew
up with. They have changed little if at all as you grew from childhood to
adulthood. You have a life of your own as an adult, but your parents are still
part of your life, still in your life. How they are in your life, I suggest,
may be the most important determinant of your adult life.
Psychology Matter
Clinical problems, psychotherapy, and the medicalization of personal troubles
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Saturday, February 11, 2012
What's the matter? (Diagnosis)
Based
on persistent distress and so on, people ask about themselves or others “What’s
the matter?”
Sunday, January 8, 2012
Addiction as a "marker" of the problem rather than the problem
The title refers to a perennial
disagreement among people who treat addictions of all sorts, namely whether to
think of addiction (to alcohol or sex or anything else) as the problem
(disease, disorder…) itself, or whether to think of addiction as one sign (and
not the only one) of a problem that actually generates the addiction (as well
as other signs, if one looks carefully).
Saturday, December 10, 2011
What Stands Out about Addicts
First
the usual caveat about “addiction”: It does not lend itself to precise
definition. It really is a term indicating use (substance or activity) on the
part of someone that has come to stand out to others or the user him/herself as
damaging well-being and which resists efforts to eliminate or modulate.
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Why Change is so Difficult
Perhaps therapists see a biased
sample. Perhaps there are people who recognize a need to change something
important about the way they live and execute change in a timely manner.
But I must admit that what stands out to me as a therapist as well as through
informal (non-therapy) relationships is how hard most people find it to change
any well-entrenched aspect of how they face the world or live in the world day
to day, regardless of how desirable it might seem to let us say “upgrade” how
they go about living life.
Monday, August 1, 2011
The Importance of Desire for Change and Therapy
The issue of how therapy can help a
person move away from excessive, self-harming use of a substance or activity
cannot be discussed meaningfully without attention to the actual intention of
the person entering therapy.
Friday, July 1, 2011
Is There Really Mental Disorder?
Published in The Humanistic Psychologist, Volume 38, Issue 4, 2010
Link to published article
Abstract
Proponents of the
reality of mental disorder claim that mental disorder is ontologically
real in the same sense that the variola virus and smallpox are
ontologically real. The chief architect of the DSM-III revolution, Robert Spitzer (Zimmerman & Spitzer, 2005),
candidly admits that a diagnosis of primary mental disorder present
must be arbitrary because the distress or social impairment under
consideration could well be a normal-range reaction to stressful events.
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Does Psychological Dysfunction Mean Anything?
with David Cohen, Ph.D.
Abstract
Abstract
Any effort to discuss or study
psychopathology (by any name) must decide how to distinguish between
psychopathology and narratively
comprehensible reactions to adverse circumstances
of life. A pathology framework, which views the distressed individual as
acted on by impersonal forces, is incompatible with
an agential framework, which views the individual as the protagonist in
a unique story.
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Environmental Failure-Oppression is the Only Cause of Psychopathology
The Journal of Mind and Behavior , Winter and Spring 1994, Volume 15, Numbers 1 and 2, Pages 1-18, ISSN 0271-0137
(connect to: The Journal of Mind and Behavior)
ABSTRACT
The present paper intends to clear the way to considering all psychopathology as responses to failures in the human environment by examining three common sources of error in scientific reasoning about psychopathology: (i) the false identification of "biological considerations" with the sub-interest of organic pathology, (ii) the idea that a person could be genetically predisposed or vulnerable to psychopathology, (iii) the failure to distinguish between causal forms of explanation and explanation based upon connections of meaning and significance.
For convenience, the omnibus term "environmental failure-oppression" (EFO) is introduced to refer to the totality of possible failures in the human environment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)